To “shrug off” effects of carbon emissions is, to…
To “shrug off” effects of carbon emissions is, to use a climate science term, the most significant global injustice FORCING yet to be seen
To “shrug off” effects of carbon emissions is, to use a climate science term, the most significant global injustice FORCING yet to be seen
2°C warming a ‘prescription for disaster’ says top climate scientist James Hansen http://t.co/tqwDJZQ7Ql //and this is our “goal”; scary
“hanging out on Google” for #EcoTheology conversation at http://t.co/Pu4PfD0VSj Come in and shoot the breeze about climate and ecotheology
.@MichaelEMann : “we must get past the unworthy debate: whether or not a problem exists, & on to what to do about it” http://t.co/wfnACWJfS7
The world needs to triple its investments in clean energy innovation http://t.co/f2eVaztT94
It really is stunning, the ratio of blah-blah-blah on climate change to actual $$$ spent on R&D to solve it. And maddening.
It would help if media and orgs would help the people “just think” about what that means.
.@SenSanders: “5-10°F warmer by the end of 21st cent. Just think of all the cataclysmic impacts that will mean” http://t.co/MYrFkDv2FA
.@SenSanders says Congress not capable of regulating Wall St. Rather, Wall St regulates the Congress http://t.co/35PDH7zU1o
15% of Dem voters named climate change as the most important issue facing the country http://t.co/9gZKdku4BC // I’d say that’s “on the map”