Blog post: Climate as “Topic” on Denomination’s Website? It’s more than “Topic”, it’s our Theology: http://t.co/tvWDJW0UGv

Investors could lose $4.2tn because of climate change, report warns http://t.co/kw9Eqpei7q via The @Guardian

My rely to my last question 2 posts ago: “I hope so. I tend to trust @BillMcKibben & have grown to despise “middle-seeking” ways in media

My prev post’s question comes after being impressed with @Revkin ‘s actually well-balanced (better than “middle”) article on peer review

Wow. @BillMcKibben to Andy @Revkin in 2011 “your relentlessly middle-seeking blog” http://t.co/KecY2H3aaG. Has this changed in 4 yrs?

Notes from a Climate Conference Junkie, Part 1 http://t.co/x2PEKHf7PX by James Long, whom I met at @PandoPopulus and have since spoken with

Articles like this (@Revkin) : what SO MANY pushing “unsettled science” to back skepticism/denial NEED to understand http://t.co/yjrqHXnlQh

Big thank you to Andy @Revkin (HT to @MichaelEMann) for a great article on the Peer Review Process & the pitfalls of premature publishing

“The continued circulation of the non-peer-reviewed draft can act as a kind of pollution of the scientific literature” @KenCaldeira

“it is often unclear to the uninitiated what it means to be published in an EGU ‘Discussions’ journal” http://t.co/YMpjNYSZZd – @KenCaldeira

Andrew @Revkin on the problem of “when work is promoted before it is publicized or peer reviewed” http://t.co/7HEO2KuPtS HT @MichaelEMann